|
Viewpoints and Advocacy
Themes and Issues |
Migrant Rights
Strengthening the rights of Migrant
Workers and their Families with International Human Rights Treaties.
Presentation made by Archbishop Silvano
Tomasi- the Holy Sees Representative to the UN in Geneva
during the launch of the latest ICMC publication
STRENGTHENING PROTECTION OF MIGRANT WORKERS
AND THEIR FAMILIES
Johan Ketelers, Secretary General of ICMC, dear Friends, it
is always a welcomed occasion to take part in the ICMC activities
and join with all of you in support of the cause of all uprooted
persons
1. Migrants find themselves at the center of a lively political
and social controversy at this moment. With immigration at a historical
height, in the EU, in the USA, in the oil exporting countries
of the Middle East, actually in every continent, migrants are
a public hot issue in media and in legislative debates.
The causes of the exodus are underlined. Violation of human rights,
environment degradation, economic inequalities push an increasing
number of people to move and search for better a chance in life;
others are pulled by developed countries that need their skills.
Emphasis is placed on the fact that migrants without proper
documents increase in most regions. A recent editorial in The
New York Times pointed out that many people blindly insist that
a solution to the problem is one of two things: exploit them or
expel them.
2. The scholarly community observes that migrants are the component
of population change most difficult to define, measure and estimate
reliably. The U.N. Population Division (World Population Prospect
- The 2004 Revision: Highlights. New York, 2005) highlights, however,
that today 95 per cent of population growth is absorbed by the
developing world and 5 per cent by the developed world, burdened
with the phenomenon of ageing. It adds that during 2005-2050,
the net number of international migrants to more developed regions
is projected to be 98 million or an average of 2.2 million annually.
The
avenues opened to these millions of migrants are conditioned by
a contradiction. The economic and demographic need for migrants
is confronted with the political and cultural resistance to their
presence. The result is a limited legal avenue for entrance and
an inevitable use of alternative ways. Perhaps unwanted, the consequence
is a dominant perception of the migrants as the invading stranger,
an image of vulnerability that leads to exploitation.
The international community and liberal democratic theory facing
the massive presence of migrants struggle to find a viable response.
The already challenging task is complicated by a globalized economy.
3. Two key words have been resonating with force in recent discussions
on migration: development and management. Actually the words are
not new. When in 1994 at the International Conference on Population
and Development in Cairo we negotiated chapter X, International
Migration, of the Program of Action, migration as a component
of development and the necessity of multilateral management were
clearly spelled out.
The assumption in this general approach seems to be that migrants
are a problem and that the best way to limit their negative impact
is to show their functional role in the economy, a positive role
that benefits everyone participating in the intricate systems
of interdependence involving sending, transit and receiving countries
as well as migrants themselves, their families and their employers.
The logical next step to achieve a positive result for the economy
is an intelligent and efficient management: of flows, of access
to the labour market, of the level of political tolerance, of
the degree acceptable for social benefits.
Obviously it makes good sense both to recognize the economic
contribution of migrants, which is quite real, and to strive for
an orderly system of human mobility since it bears directly on
good international relations.
This message emerges with clarity, for example, from the final
report of the Global Commission on International Migration titled:
Migration in an Interconnected World:
New Directions for Action. (Geneva,
2005) This important report opens up also a window on the causes
of migration and reaffirms that migration should be out of choice
rather than necessity, the first right being that of living a
decent life in one's country. Then, this right should be part
of a legal and normative framework for the protection of the migrants'
human rights.
The U.N. General Assembly Resolutions calling for a High Level
Dialogue next September 14-15, 2006, are equally sensitive to
mention human rights, but focus on development.
These and other similar initiatives prove that it is not possible
today to deal with major social issues without some reference
to human rights. But how central and how much implemented are
these rights for the migrants?
Is it enough, one may ask, to analyze migratory movements and
call for coherence and cooperation regarding their effects on
development and on management?
4. A different starting point may help. If migrants are not seen
primarily as a problem but as a normal dimension of the human
condition, then it would be easier to place them at the center
of the debate.
History is marked and civilizations are shaped by migrations
and migrations will keep up in the future, and not just because
of economic and demographic needs. This conviction seems widely
shared and supported by population projections.
The major receiving countries and regions, however, have blocked
holding a U.N. Conference on Migration and have ignored the major
international human rights instrument for the protection of migrants,
the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of
All Migrant Workers and Members o Their Families (1990), on the
fear that it would give new rights to undocumented migrants. Instead,
a wide ratification of this Convention would give a signal that
a right-based approach to migration, in the long run, can regulate
more effectively and make more positive the movement of people.
5. Without underplaying the multidimensional complexity of the
migration phenomenon, the social teaching of the Catholic Church
has rooted its approach to migration on the migrants themselves,
on our common humanity, and this in the context of an inclusive
world development that is socially sustainable. The human person
and his/her dignity is at the center. For this reason, the fundamental
and inalienable human rights of the human person must be protected
independently of geography of origin. The State, therefore, has
the obligation to safeguard the human rights of everyone in its
territory. Since migration is a transnational phenomenon, it concerns
also multilateral agreements and the whole international community.
Hence the necessity of a global system of protection and coordination.
The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church offers the
following summary of where its reflection and universal view has
arrived:
| Institutions in host countries must keep
careful watch to prevent the spread of the temptation to exploit
foreign labourers, denying them the same rights enjoyed by
nationals, rights that are to be guaranteed to all without
discrimination. Regulating immigration according to criteria
of equity and balance is one of the indispensable conditions
for ensuring that immigrants are integrated into society with
the guarantees required by recognition of their human dignity.
Immigrants are to be received as persons and helped, together
with their families, to become a part of societal life. In
this context, the right of reuniting families should be respected
and promoted. At the same time, conditios that foster increase
work opportunities in people's place of origin are to be promoted
as much as possible. ( n. 298) |
6. A balanced juridical framework that takes into account the
rights of individual migrants and of the State seems an appropriate
way forward for a constructive global migration policy. The Convention
on Migrant Workers and other related instruments translate the
principles of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights into practical
measures.
The continuation of the work for their wide ratification remains
critical. The development of legal norms for the protection of
migrants is an incremental process that is slowly making progress.
It is a long-term task. As migrations will continue and increase,
even in new forms, a human rights centered approach becomes a
greater priority for a positive comprehensive response.
For decades, the International Catholic Migration Commission
has been at the forefront in field work and advocacy for refugees
and migrants. Its new publications: Strengthening
Protection of Migrant Workers and Their Families with International
Human Rights Treaties: A Do-it-yourself Kit, keeps up a
valuable tradition and it adds strength to a right-based coordinated,
coherent and constructive international migration. May this timely
initiative meet with great success.
+ Silvano M. Tomasi, c.s.
|